bodybuildingforyou.com
bodybuilding supplement reviews
fat burners and weight loss
supplement reviews by users
bodybuilding guides
training and fitness
health and nutrition
chat forums
 

Creatine Monohydrate

Creatine monohydrate info.
Creatine benefits
Creatine side effects
Creatine use and cycling
Creatine serum vs. powder
Creatine Monohydrate FAQ
Creatine Monohydrate FAQ 2
Creatine and Health 1
Creatine and Health 2
EAS Betagen Review
Kre Alkalyn Creatine Review
MuscleTech Cell Tech Review
MuscleTech CellTech Review 2
NO Xplode Creatine Review - BSN
Nutrex Vitargo CGL Creatine
Homemade Celltech Phosphagen
San V12 Turbo Review

Protein Supplements

100% Whey Protein Review
100% Egg Protein Review
Anator P70 Review
Cytosport Muscle Milk Review
Cytosport Cytogainer Review
Designer Protein Review
Dymatize Elite Whey Protein
Egg Protein - Egg White Protein
Heavy Weight Gainer 900
Methoxy Pro Supplement Review
MuscleTech Nitro Tech Review
Osmo Build Fast Protein Review
Whey Protein Compared - 1
Whey Protein Compared - 2
Protein Supplement Showdown - 1
Whey Concentrate Showdown - 2
Whey Isolate Showdown - 3
Protein Blends Showdown - 4
Other Proteins Showdown - 5
Pinnacle Juiced Protein Review
Pro Complex Protein Review
Prolab N-Large 2 Review
Protein Myth 1
Protein Myths 2
Sci Fit Econo Whey Protein Review
Soy Protein Supplements
Soy Protein Isolate Info
Soy Protein Benefits
Stallone Instone Pudding Review
Whey protein information
Whey isolate & concentrate
Whey protein side effects
Whey comparison guide
Whey Protein and Cancer Benefits
Whey Protein - More Info 1
Whey Protein - More Info 2
Whey Protein Process Method - 1
Whey Protein Process Method - 2

Protein Bar Reviews

Best Protein Bars Compared
Chef Jay's Tri-O-Plex Bar
Clif Energy Bar Review
Designer Whey U Turn Bar Review
Detour Bar Review
Luna Bar Review
Power Bar Review
Power Bar Harvest Review
Power Bar Protein Plus Review
Power Bars Compared
Promax Energy Bar Review
Protein Bar & Nutrition Bars
Protein Bars Review Guide

Meal Replacements

Meal Replacements Compared 1
Meal Replacements Compared 2
Meal Replacements Compared 3
Meal Replacements Compared 4
Meal MRP Replacements Guide
EAS Myoplex MRP Review
IIsopure MRP Review
Lean Body MRP Review
Lean Mass Complex Review
Met Rx MRP Review
Met Rx Products
MuscleTech MesoTech Review

Supplement Reviews

Animal Pak Review
Animal Stak Review
Alpha Lipoic Acid Info
ABB Carbo Force Energy Drink
Accelerade Sports Drink
Bodybuiding Supplements 1
Bodybuiding Supplements 2
BSN Endorush Review - 1
BSN Endorush Review - 2
BSN Supplement Stack - 1
BSN Cell Mass Review - 2
BSN True Mass Review - 3
BSN Axis HT Review - 4
BSN Syntha 6 Review -5
BSN Nutrition Conclusion - 6
BSN Nitrix Review
Chrysin Supplement Information
CoEnzyme Q10 - CoQ10 Info
Cytosport Cytomax Sports Drink
Dymetadrine Xtreme Review
Endurox R4 Carbohydrate Drink
Ergopharm 1 AD Prohormone
Ergopharm 1 AD Side Effects
Flax Seed Oil Health Benefits
GABA Supplement Information
Ginkgo Biloba Information
HMB Supplement - EAS HMB
Horny Goat Weed Information
Instone Forza T Review
L-Glutamine information
Glutamine Side Effects
Glucosamine Chondroitin
Muscletech Gakic Review
Muscletech Leukic Review - 1
Muscletech Leukic Review - 2
Muscletech Leukic Review - 3
Nutrex Vitrix Review
NO2 Supplement Review
Palo Alto Lab Paravol
Pinnacle NoX2 Review
Ribose Supplements Review
Ribose & Creatine Stack
Saw Palmetto Herb Extract
Taurin Supplement Information
Tongkat Ali Supplement
Tribulus Terrestris Facts & Info
Tribulus Side Effects & Stack
Xyience Xenergy Review
ZMA Z Mass PM, Cyclo Zmass
Coral Calcium Supplement
Yohimbe Bark Extract Info

Weightloss & Fat Burners

Biotest Hot Rox Review
CLA Supplement Information
Hydroxycut Ephedra Free
Hydroxycut Hardcore
Instone Leanfire
Lean System 7 Review
Stacker 2 Fat Burner Review
NutraSport Cutting Gel Review
Trimspa Ephedra Free
Xenadrine EFX
Xenadrine NRG Review
Zantrex 3 Diet Pil

 

Nutrex Vitargo CGL Review

Vitargo CGL Creatine

I'm sure you've probably heard of the terms creatine transport and insulin spike - all associated with creatine / carbohydrate transport supplements such as Cell Tech, EAS Phosphagen, AST Creatine HSC, and many other similar creatine and carbohydrate (dextrose) type of products on the market today.

But you may not be familiar with terms such as "osmolality rate" used in promoting Nutrex Vitargo CGL advantages over other creatine & dextrose supplements. This has something to do with the type of carbohydrate and its molecular weight which extends various benefits to transporting creatine within your body.

 
 
BB4U Newsletter

Sign up today to receive our low volume newsletter. Updates, news, new reviews, and whatever else crosses our minds.
Privacy Statement

>> Click here to subscribe today!

Submit Your Articles!

Submit your articles to BodybuildingForYou!

- Receive free publicity
- Help thousands of others, and
- Have your articles read by tens of thousands of readers!

>> Learn More Here

Support BB4U!

Make a donation by paypal to help support BB4U to continue providing you with top notch reviews and articles. Thank you!

Click Below
Share A Review!

Send in your reviews, and feedback on any supplement, and share your experience with others. Help us creatine a large database of supplement reviews that will benefit everyone!

Click here to read other users's reviews.

Burn the Fat Feed the Muscle by Tom Venuto

Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle" contains all the information you'll ever need to help you melt away body fat permanently.
>> Click here.

 
 

Vitargo CGL Nutrition Facts:
Serving Size (scoop) 2
Servings Per 22
Calories 287
Fat Calories 0
Creatine Monohydrate 10g
Cholesterol (mg) 0
Sodium (mg) 100
Potassium (mg) 150
Total Carbs (g) 70
Sugars (g) 0
Proteins (g) 0
Magnesium (mg) 50
Phosphorous (mg) 200
*Vitargo (g) 70

Ingredient Details:
*Vitargo (patented sugar-free high molecular weight carbohydrate from Swedish maxy maize starch), pure grade creatine monohydrate, natural and artificial flavors, citric acid, osmosis balancing electrolytes, silicon dioxide, sucralose, FD&C red 40.

Nutrex Vitargo CGL Creatine - What's the Difference?

Looking at the above ingredient list for Vitargo CGL, the basics of it are like any other creatine transport supplement - 70g of carbohydrate and 10g of creatine monohydrate. So what's the big deal you ask? Well let's just compare it to cell tech for a second:

Cell-Tech Hardcore: 75g dextrose (carbohydrate) & 10g creatine
Vitargo CGL: 70g carbohydrates & 10g creatine

Hmmm... not much difference other than 5 gram of carbohydrates. Well, not so. There's a big difference in the carbohydrates used in Vitargo CGL compared to other carbohydrate/creatine products. It uses a "high molecular weight carbohydrate" which Nutrex calls "Vitargo" that claims to have low osmolality rate while high GI carbs like dextrose and maltodextrin has high osmolality rate.

What does that all mean?

Osmolality simply means the concentration of particles in a solution. This is probably not the most scientific definition, but most of the scientific definitions are barely understandable. A solution that has a low osmolality than blood is referred to as being Hypotonic, which means that a low osmolality solution passes through the stomach faster as compared to a high osmolality solution.

So what's all this talk about the high molecular weight carbohydrate (Vitargo)?

Vitargo, a "high molecular weight carbohydrate", has a molecular weight of around 500,000 to 700,000. While dextrose has a molecular weight of about 180, and maltodextrin has a molecular weight of about 1,000 to 10,000. The lower the molecular weight a carbohydrate has, the higher osmolality it has. So by having a much higher molecular weight, Vitargo has a much lower osmolality, making it pass through the stomach faster than dextrose or maltodextrin. Simple enough, right?

Okay, so with all this talk about molecular weight, and osmolality, where's the scientific evidence to back it all up?

Vitargo CGL Studies

Improved gastric emptying rate in humans of a unique glucose polymer with gel-forming properties.
Leiper JB, Aulin KP, Söderlund K.
Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, Aberdeen University, UK.

This study looked at the rate of gastric emptying of two isoenergetic carbohydrate solutions with different osmolality. 6 healthy males were studied on 2 occasions using 550ml solution containing 13.5% carbohydrate named "G-Drink" and "C-Drink", where the C-Drink was hypotonoic with low osmolality (like Vitargo).

The study found that the half emptying time for the C-drink (hypotonic) was faster than the G-Drink. They also found that the amount of carbohydrates delivered to the small intestine was greater during the first 10 min after ingestion of C-drink compared to the G-Drink.

They concluded that the carbohydrates in C-drink, although has the tendency to form a gel, empties from the stomach faster than the G-drink.

Muscle glycogen resynthesis rate in humans after supplementation of drinks containing carbohydrates with low and high molecular masses.
Piehl Aulin K, Söderlund K, Hultman E.
Department of Medical Sciences, University of Uppsala/LIVI, S-791 88 Falun, Sweden.

This study looked at the rate of muscle glycogen synthesis during 2 and 4 hours of recovery after depletion by exercise using two energy equivalent carbohydrate drinks. the C-drink has a molecular mass of 500000 to 700000 (just like Vitargo) with osmolality of 84, and the G-drink has a molecular mass of about 500 with osmolality of 350.

13 healthy and well trained men took the drinks after glycogen depleting exercise - one drink at each test occasion. Total carbohydrates consumed was 300g given in 75g doses in 4 settings - immediately after exercise, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 90 minutes after exercise. Blood glucose and insulin concentrations were recorded every 30 minutes of the 4 hour recovery period.

The study found that the glycogen synthesis rate was significantly higher during the initial 2 hours for the C-drink (vitargo) compared to the G drink, leading to the conclusion that osmolality of the carbohydrate drink may influence the rate of resynthesis of glycogen in muscle after its depletion by exercise.

Nutrex Vitargo CGL - My Review

Having finished my fruit punch flavored Vitargo CGL, I have to say that its effects are more noticeable compared to other dextrose / maltodextrin based creatine delivery supplements. We've received numerous user reviews of Vitargo, you can read them there, or share your own experiences as well. The user feedback are overwhelmingly positive, giving Vitargo a very high overall rating.

I found that the mixed solution tends to be somewhat slimy, almost gel like, just as the studies above mentioned, it tends to get gel-like. I highly recommend following the bottle instructions, and shake your mix vigorously for a minute or so. I didn't shake it so well my first time, and by the time I finished drinking it, there was a thick layer of settled "gel" at the bottom of the shaker cup - lesson learned!

Tastewise, I've only tried the fruit punch flavor. While it's not an exceptionally tasty mix, it's quite decent. Following the powder to water proportions recommended by the container, it turns out to be a light tasting drink mix.

>> Click here for Nutrex Vitargo CGL

 

 

Back to Bodybuilding Supplements Reviews Home Page

If you found this article informative and helpful please forward it to someone you know who can benefit from this information.

 

 
Pete Sisco's Maximum Strength


Pete Sisco is the developer of Power Factor Training and Static Contraction Training - over 200,000 people worldwide have trained using Pete's methods.

In just 10 weeks of Static Contraction training, trainees (hardcore bodybuilders who had been lifting "heavy" for a long time and averaged 38years old) achieved the following average gains:

  • 51.3% increase static strength
  • 27.6% increase in one-rep max in full range of motion! (without doing full range lifts for 10 weeks!)
pete sisco static contraction training
  • 34.3% increase in ten-rep max in full range of motion! (see above)
  • gained 9.0 pounds of new muscle (one subject gained 29 pounds of muscle!)
  • gained 1/2 inch on each biceps, 1.1 inches on chest, and 1.2 inches on shoulders
  • lost 4.9 pounds of fat & lost 0.4 inches on waist

Have you had size and strength gains like the above in the last 10 weeks? With Pete's no-nonsense, scientific approach to bodybuilding and strength training you can achieve your goals and go beyond.

>> Click here for Pete Sisco's Maximum Strength Program <<

 


© 2001-2006 BodybuildingForYou. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WORLDWIDE

Our privacy statement
Disclaimer and Terms of Use

jim@bodybuildingforyou.com
Bodybuilding Supplements For You