|
02-02-2006, 12:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
its called rear-end gears and depending on the ratio, will depend how fast your going and at what rpm.... obviously, lower the gears the faster u can drive at lower rpms.. I got 3.73 gears in my camaro, along with the 4 gear 700-r4 tranny, i can race and ride.... i aint saying its great on gas tho none the less, horse power isnt the only factor to blame
__________________
Breathing new life - back into me. Challenging all - powers that be... 
|
|
02-02-2006, 01:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
true, 3.73 will give you a better acceleration, but kill you on gas on the freeway. even better for acceleration would be 4.10's but i would never put those in a car i drive often.
there are a lot of factors to acceleration(gear ratio, weight, power transfer to wheels, traction, capable clutch, etc.) but given you have any rwd car with 600 hp, its gonna whoop ass on the highway.
__________________
6'2" 225lbs 12% BF
|
|
02-03-2006, 08:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
*appauled*
|
|
02-03-2006, 09:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
What up PADZZ? long time.
Uh yeah, about that, umm well, yeah uhhh i guess i dont have an excuse. i actually didnt realize thats what i typed, nonetheless i did. "BUFF, hold your tongue!" I have a problem about getting into stuff and just typing whatever comes out. i guess the f-word isnt the most appropriate, eh? Oh, i leave april 5.
__________________
6'2" 225lbs 12% BF
|
|
02-03-2006, 09:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
02-03-2006, 11:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, but honestly, you were right in doing so. I sometimes forget, you know. I really do appreciate that you care enough to even make fun of me and sarcasticaly remind me that i need to be righteous. your wife is a member, no? atleast you have an inside scoop of what its about, even though you may give me a hard about it. thats why i like you. your comments arent from ignorance, but from sarcasm and i can appreciate that.
__________________
6'2" 225lbs 12% BF
|
|
02-03-2006, 04:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
When it comes done to it, american muscle cars are the baddest *****es on the road. You can't get more power for a better price in anything else out there. Even better yet, you can do all the **** to it you want in your own driveway. (I'd rather pound my nuts with a hammer than to try to change the oil on a rice burner.) Not to mention they are built better and have nicer lines. Don't understand why anyone could talk bad about them...
RX7/RX8/S2000/M5/Bugatti Veyron/GTR/DBRS9/SL600/SL65 anyday: *falls off chair laughing* Camaro, Chevelle, Nova, GTO, Duster, Corvette, Daytona, Cuda, Super Bee- I'd sell my soul to the devil for any of these...
|
|
02-03-2006, 07:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
6'2" 225lbs 12% BF
|
|
02-06-2006, 12:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
dude a SL65 AMG is... damn, i rode in my friends SL55, scary fast,
dont forget the DBRS9 is the street legal version of aston martins race track DB9, full carbon fiber body, and the bugatti veyron goes 1-60 in 2.5 seconds with a top speed of 255 miles an hour, heck, veyron vs mclaren SLR, the veyron can let the SLR go to 60 before starting up and still beat it to 200, oh i forgot the ferarri F430 to the list.
|
|
02-06-2006, 03:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
