BodybuildingForYou - Bodybuilding Forums  

Go Back   BodybuildingForYou - Bodybuilding Forums > Anabolic Steroids, Prohormones, and Testosterone Enhancers > Anabolic Steroids & Anabolic Chemistry & Testosterone Enhancers

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2006, 09:23 AM
Massive D's Avatar
Massive D Massive D is offline
BB4U Feather Weight
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 77
Massive D is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Massive D
Default Why Bodybuilders should avoid Nolvadex....

Got this from Nexus thought you guys might like a read..


Why Nolvadex Should be Avoided at All Cost
by Dharkam


Nolvadex is the trade name of a drug containing a molecule called Tamoxifen. Its primary use by male bodybuilders is to prevent gynecomastia (the growth of the breast tissue). It was introduced by steroid guru Dan Duchaine 25 years ago. After a quarter of century, it is time for an update about its use. What I am going to demonstrate is it is high time to eliminate Nolvadex from the bodybuilder's drug stacks.

A Little Bit of History

Back in the late 70's, more and more bodybuilders developed strange lumps around their mammary glands. At first, no one really took notice but more and more competitors grew a gynecomastia. In 1981, the M Olympia had a pretty serious gyno. This was shortly after the introduction of this new drug by Dan Duchaine. At the time, it was a pretty good idea as no one else could came up with a solution in order to prevent this growing problem. Nolvadex was popularised by Dan's first Underground Steroid Handbook. Dan even states that "this drug has a lot of potential but hasn't been used enough yet to find it". After more than 25 years of intensive usage, it is my opinion that it is time to forget about Nolvadex. Why? First, because newer and more effective drugs have been developed. Second, because it seems obvious that Nolvadex impairs muscle growth.

Nolvadex and Muscle Growth

After so many years of usage, it seems pretty clear that if Tamoxifen helps prevent the growth of the nipples, it also weakens the anabolic properties of steroids in a majority of bodybuilders. We are frequently said that this weakening effect is due to the anti-estrogenic action of Nolvadex. According to the fantasy, muscles require both testosterone and estrogens to grow at an optimal rate.

This belief is derived from the results of studies showing that without estrogens, testosterone alone possesses minimal anabolic properties. By increasing the density of androgen receptors, estrogens render the muscles much more sensitive to testosterone (1). This has been demonstrated in a very specific muscle called the levator ani. But this muscle does not reflect what happens in the muscles bodybuilders are interested in (2). Estrogens have even been shown to reduce muscle fiber size (3-4). I think this effect of estrogens is closer to what we experience on bodybuilders.

Another popular explanation of the weakening action of Nolvadex is provided by studies which have shown that it reduced the plasma level of IGF-1. I do not think this is a primary explanation.

What Nolvadex Truly Is

Most lifters assume Nolvadex is a pure estrogen antagonist (which would mean it prevents estrogens from acting on their receptors). As far as bodybuilding is concerned, this assumption is very wrong as Nolvadex is both an estrogen receptor agonist and an antagonist. It all depends upon the tissues. Along with the nipples, on which Nolvadex acts mainly as an antagonist, we are also interested by its behaviour on skeletal muscles, on the liver and on the fat cells.

Nolvadex has been shown to behave as estrogens in skeletal muscles (5). This is a very good thing for every athletes except bodybuilders. You see, estrogens protect muscle cells from the training-induced damages (5-6). It means that one can train more without damaging his muscles. Recovery will also be much faster. But for bodybuilders, the training-induced damages are a key ingredient to trigger growth. Nolvadex will therefore reduce the muscle building effects of resistance training.

As for the impact of Tamoxifen on IGF-1, it simply demonstrates another estrogen-like action of Nolvadex. By rendering the liver less sensitive to growth hormone (probably by reducing the liver density of GH receptors), estrogens and tamoxifen diminish the production of IGF-1. This action of estrogens explains why women produce less IGF-1 than men eventhough the have a higher GH level.

Nolvadex and Muscle Definition

Within 24 to 48 hours, Nolvadex is able to greatly increase muscular definition. As a result, bodybuilders assume Nolvadex will help them reduce their bodyfat level. But this rapid cutting action of Nolvadex is due to an anti-estrogenic action on water retention. Estrogens will make you hold water. Nolvadex will produce the opposite effect. But it says nothing about the impact of Tamoxifen on bodyfat. Depending upon your own production of estrogens and your estrogen receptor density on adipocytes, Nolvadex can act as an antagonist (which would help you lose fat) or an agonist. In that case, Nolvadex will make you fatter especially in the lower body area.

Conclusion: if the introduction of Nolvadex 25 years ago was a brilliant idea, times have changed. Very effective anti-aromatase drugs (such as Letrozole or Anastrazole) have been introduced. They will fight gynecomastia, help prevent the anti-anabolic actions of estrogens, fight fat and water retention. They will also boost natural testosterone production far more effectively than Nolvadex. So, it is up to you to decide whether you wish impair your rate of progression with an outdated drug or move on to the 21st century.

Bibliography:

(1) Max SR. Androgen-estrogen synergy in rat levator ani muscle: glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1984 Dec;38(2-3):103-7.

(2) Rance NE, Max SR. Modulation of the cytosolic androgen receptor in striated muscle by sex steroids. Endocrinology. 1984 Sep;115(3):862-6.

(3) Kobori M, Yamamuro T. Effects of gonadectomy and estrogen administration on rat skeletal muscle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Jun;(243):306-11.

(4) Suzuki S, Yamamuro T. Long-term effects of estrogen on rat skeletal muscle. Exp Neurol. 1985 Feb;87(2):291-9.

(5) Koot RW, Amelink GJ, Blankenstein MA, Bar PR. Tamoxifen and oestrogen both protect the rat muscle against physiological damage. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1991;40(4-6):689-95.

(6) Naessens G, De Slypere JP, Dijs H, Driessens M. Hypogonadism as a cause of recurrent muscle injury in a high level soccer player. A case report. Int J Sports Med. 1995 Aug;16(6):413-7.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2006, 09:32 AM
t_dot_porkchop's Avatar
t_dot_porkchop t_dot_porkchop is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 651
t_dot_porkchop is a name known to allt_dot_porkchop is a name known to all
Default

i believe this....while on a cycle, an AI such as letro is favored over nolva, atleast for me.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2006, 10:09 AM
TRAZ's Avatar
TRAZ TRAZ is offline
BB4U Super Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 2,757
TRAZ is a splendid one to beholdTRAZ is a splendid one to beholdTRAZ is a splendid one to beholdTRAZ is a splendid one to behold
Default

Good post! Very interesting and provocative!
__________________
"We're only alive on the edge of the moment." ~Zarathustra
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2006, 10:19 AM
RRAdam RRAdam is offline
Pretentious Rodomont
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Unus Mundus
Posts: 724
RRAdam is a name known to allRRAdam is a name known to allRRAdam is a name known to all
Default

I got this crap article in the email as well. It stinks. I posted my opinion of it over on another board...

Quote:
Eh, that article stinks... nolva does lower igf to an extent, but igf is important in the formation of gyno - which may be one of the reasons why its good in combating it. of course you wouldnt want to use it on cycle unless you had a gyno flare up - but this guy just trashed nolva all to hell, unrightfully so.
__________________
rradam at cyber-rights.net
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2006, 10:28 AM
Caferacer's Avatar
Caferacer Caferacer is offline
BB4U Super Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 1,621
Caferacer is a splendid one to beholdCaferacer is a splendid one to beholdCaferacer is a splendid one to beholdCaferacer is a splendid one to beholdCaferacer is a splendid one to beholdCaferacer is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Caferacer
Default

Plus he made no mention of PCT involving nolva.
__________________
At some point you realize everyone has a 'best-by' date like milk. Even later you realize that most everyone has already passed theirs.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2006, 11:43 AM
TRAZ's Avatar
TRAZ TRAZ is offline
BB4U Super Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 2,757
TRAZ is a splendid one to beholdTRAZ is a splendid one to beholdTRAZ is a splendid one to beholdTRAZ is a splendid one to behold
Default

Yeah, if this article were true we would have heard more about it by now....
__________________
"We're only alive on the edge of the moment." ~Zarathustra
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.