Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Arch Enemy
|
very convincing. here's a selection of the confidence inspiring content of the above links.
"it was speculated that"
"All of these traits convinced Dart"
"The australopithecines are now thought to be"
"The robust variety of
Australopithecus has since been reclassified"
"The recent trend has been back to the original classification"
"apparent hybrid fossils"
there are no concrete observations to be found. only alot of speculation and hypothesising. but i guess if you've got enough faith in that sort of thing then you can believe anything.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Arch Enemy
Quote:
|
sure you can show that fruit flies have evolved into fruit flies with slightly different characteristics, but it's a very long stretch to extrapolate that into humans evolving from apes.
|
Of course it is. Looking at the evolution of fruit flies only has so much in common with human evolution. |
as usual you didn't get the point of my post. the fruit flies haven't evolved in the way you need them to, they have merely changed. the existing info is altered. get it?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Arch Enemy
Quote:
|
whats next, you'll say that finches have evolved into different types of finches!!!
|
. . . I think you might actually be getting it! |
clearly you are not though. i was being facetious. finches evolving into different types of finches doesn't help you prove apes into humans.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Arch Enemy
So where do we go from here, shmicheal?
|
well, i for one have pretty much had enough of your cutting and pasting and ignoring my posts. apparently asking for something five times (your definition of common descent as an example) is not enough so i'm about ready to stop replying.
i would like to say it's good to see jetty back though. how've you been brother?