Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BUFFLURP
I'm not for that. I've had mine, lol.
People, the reason "Creationism" can't qualify as science is because we are not near smart enough to begin to comprehend the knowledge and power it would take to accomplish such a task. We would be merely speculating what happened. And that does NOT qualify as science. Doesn't mean it didnt happen though.
Evolution is only based on science. Micro-evolution is apparent and obvious and can be viewed and studied. It is not a theory. It is fact.
Macro-evolution has yet to be seen, and IMO is a ridiculous theory, and will never be proven. Macro-evolution is what most people think of when the term "Evolution" is brought up. Monkey-man, etc. Not true, or should i say almost impossible to prove. If macro-evolution were true, mermaids would likeley exist. but they dont, so...
I am a religious guy, and I am absoluteley in favor of "inteligent design/creationism", but i cant deny that micro-evoltion occurs. Viruses adapt to the environment, and become immune to certain vaccines. that is exactly what micro-evolution is. But, this viruses dna does not change, and if it were to prodcue sexually, it's children viruses would not have the same immunity. Also, it doesnt become a new, smarter virus with super-virus traits, which would be macro-evolution.
having this, and say a monkey were to develop a certain immunity, It's children can't inherit immunty. Immunity is no wired into you genetic code. A mutation is an alteration of genetic code within an organism. Mutation almost always have a negative effect in where that organism dies. I can't concieve of a mutation where a monkey became super smart and became bi-pedal, and lost all of its hair and developed dope speaking skills. That's one heck of a mutation. Sounds like X-men to me. We all know x-men doesnt happen.
that's my say. have fun.
|
i just have to say this.
Read back on what you just wrote.
Now listen to this.
You've just said micro is a fact and macro is a theory:: (which is true).
THEN you go on to say how unrealistic and ridiculous macro theory is (which isnt that ridiculous if you think about it, if micro works, why not macro?). Now this is where it gets funny.
I am a religious guy, and I am absoluteley in favor of "inteligent design/creationism"
Your in favour of some intelligent designer that popped out of space and decided to create life? Sounds like someone was smoking weed when thinking up that load of ****.
Atleast we can see some form of evidence with evolution... ID is going off nothing.... oh wait they think that face of planet mars means that we were created by some bloke-- who decided to paint a picture on mars.
Im know scientist, i just believe what the scientist believe, not some religious wackos who are trying to get their creationlism theory into schools in the form of intelligent design.
However i would like to say a couple of things about evolution.
1. immunity doesnt pass to children:: Why was it when europeans went on their conquests and invaded south america the natives were killed by all the european diseases--however the effect on the europeans was far far less. This seems to me that they have built up some form of strength or immunity to european diseases over time. Its been seen in a lot of invasions where natives weren't used to european disease and massive numbers of natives died.
2. Just as we adapt to weightlifting we adapt to changes in the enviroment. We go out in the sun, we get tanned. Adapting has to do something with evolution since, since evolution was all about adapting to the changes. Now of course macro evolution cannot be proved because you would need millions of years to actually see the genes to change to actually pass to their children. I just dont think its ever going to be able to actually show.
The human body is an amazing thing it can adapt to a lot of things if you give it time to change. We still do not know everything about it. But to make this **** up about Intelligent design just because we cannot yet prove evolution because of the difficulty is really sad.